ISPPMUN 2019 Conference Summary
In the last 8 years, ISPP’s Model United Nations has expanded its reach and overseen immense success and growth. 2019’s conference proudly brought 19 schools from across the region together with hundreds of delegates to open their minds to the global issues and conflicts that are currently affecting our world. In giving students so much agency and influence, this event has reminded us of the significant role we, as young minds and leaders, play and will continue to play in building a sustainable future. The stimulating conduct of the debates and the insightful voices extended in the conference have proven the potential of each and every delegate involved. Whether their debates regarded social, political and economic aspects or issues of security and humanitarianism, there was a thorough discussion amongst delegates that encouraged an understanding of how to approach world problems and collaborate effectively with individuals of opposing viewpoints. While this conference demanded a lot of effort and professionalism from students, members were all able to bring passion and animation to their words and their actions. Without the dedication and positive demeanor of so many young delegates, this conference would not have made the strong achievements that it did. In reflecting on this event, it can be said with great confidence that there are powerful and enlightened young people taking important steps to shape our world and stimulate change.
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
Closing Ceremony |
As the Annual ISPPMUN 2019 was brought to an end, all delegates found themselves back at where everything first started: the BlackBox theatre.
“House, please come to order.” The echos of Secretary-General, Angela Wei’s voice reverberate throughout the BlackBox, quickly hushing the voices of the eager delegates. To wrap everything up, all chairs were given a 1-minute allotment to make a speech about the proceedings of their committee.
Many chairs gave their thanks to all members of the committee, making sure to show appreciation not only towards the delegates but to the hardworking admin that allowed their committees to run smoothly. They brought forth their most vivid memories of their committee, some even citing this year’s MUN as their most memorable one yet. Some Chairs mentioned specific, memorable delegates in their speech. With the Chair of GA3 calling out Fiji who fell asleep for 40 minutes to the Chair of ESCAP shouting out the Philippines to go against her own resolution on eliminating child trafficking, all committees bore memories for the delegates to take home with them. Due to the 1-min time limit, the Deputy Chair of GA1 was initially unable to make a speech. However, due to unanimous outcry by the delegates, he was quickly given a slot to speak at the end.
As a break between speeches, the ISPP high school band, Rawr Means I Love You in Dinosaur, performed 'Love' by Lana Del Rey. This brought forth a sweet and mellow mood, relaxing the delegates as ISPPMUN very closely nears its end.
Mr. Michael Brown, an organizer of ISPPMUN, gave a speech on his thoughts towards this year’s ISPPMUN. In his speech, he gave nods to a few delegates of note such as the delegate of Indonesia from the Junior Assembly for her excellent research and preparation of climate change and the delegate of South Africa for showing the characteristics of a future British MP. He gave his thanks to all staff, adults, and students, who gave their time to ensure ISPPMUN’s smooth progression. The heads of ISPPMUN, Secretary-General, Angela Wei; Deputy Secretary-General, Ji-Won Jung; Head of Press, Rattana Hok; and Head of Admin, Anouk Charlotte Jones, were brought up and presented flowers for a job well done. He closed his speech wishing to meet the fellow delegates once again next year and wishing them a safe trip home.
Deputy Secretary-General, Ji-Won Jung followed up with a speech of her own, sending her congratulations to the youths of ISPPMUN who raised their voices to make a difference concerning the overarching ideas covering today’s global challenges. Ji-Won expressed her views on MUN as a stepping stone for the youth, whose views are oftentimes dismissed as unexperienced or immature, to express their ideas and show the drive that they have in making the world a better place. Closing off the Closing Ceremony was a video encompassing the events of the past 3 days made by the MUN press team. This video included Angela Wei’s Opening Ceremony remarks along with a series of clips of the debates and voting that took place in each committee.
With that, ISPPMUN 2019 came to a close and the BlackBox was quickly emptied as 300 delegates across 20 schools went on their way to make a safe trip back to their homes with a heart heavy with the memories of ISPPMUN 2019.
“House, please come to order.” The echos of Secretary-General, Angela Wei’s voice reverberate throughout the BlackBox, quickly hushing the voices of the eager delegates. To wrap everything up, all chairs were given a 1-minute allotment to make a speech about the proceedings of their committee.
Many chairs gave their thanks to all members of the committee, making sure to show appreciation not only towards the delegates but to the hardworking admin that allowed their committees to run smoothly. They brought forth their most vivid memories of their committee, some even citing this year’s MUN as their most memorable one yet. Some Chairs mentioned specific, memorable delegates in their speech. With the Chair of GA3 calling out Fiji who fell asleep for 40 minutes to the Chair of ESCAP shouting out the Philippines to go against her own resolution on eliminating child trafficking, all committees bore memories for the delegates to take home with them. Due to the 1-min time limit, the Deputy Chair of GA1 was initially unable to make a speech. However, due to unanimous outcry by the delegates, he was quickly given a slot to speak at the end.
As a break between speeches, the ISPP high school band, Rawr Means I Love You in Dinosaur, performed 'Love' by Lana Del Rey. This brought forth a sweet and mellow mood, relaxing the delegates as ISPPMUN very closely nears its end.
Mr. Michael Brown, an organizer of ISPPMUN, gave a speech on his thoughts towards this year’s ISPPMUN. In his speech, he gave nods to a few delegates of note such as the delegate of Indonesia from the Junior Assembly for her excellent research and preparation of climate change and the delegate of South Africa for showing the characteristics of a future British MP. He gave his thanks to all staff, adults, and students, who gave their time to ensure ISPPMUN’s smooth progression. The heads of ISPPMUN, Secretary-General, Angela Wei; Deputy Secretary-General, Ji-Won Jung; Head of Press, Rattana Hok; and Head of Admin, Anouk Charlotte Jones, were brought up and presented flowers for a job well done. He closed his speech wishing to meet the fellow delegates once again next year and wishing them a safe trip home.
Deputy Secretary-General, Ji-Won Jung followed up with a speech of her own, sending her congratulations to the youths of ISPPMUN who raised their voices to make a difference concerning the overarching ideas covering today’s global challenges. Ji-Won expressed her views on MUN as a stepping stone for the youth, whose views are oftentimes dismissed as unexperienced or immature, to express their ideas and show the drive that they have in making the world a better place. Closing off the Closing Ceremony was a video encompassing the events of the past 3 days made by the MUN press team. This video included Angela Wei’s Opening Ceremony remarks along with a series of clips of the debates and voting that took place in each committee.
With that, ISPPMUN 2019 came to a close and the BlackBox was quickly emptied as 300 delegates across 20 schools went on their way to make a safe trip back to their homes with a heart heavy with the memories of ISPPMUN 2019.
Written by Viriyan Mak
Plenary |
The commencement of the final debates occurred in the conference’s plenary on Sunday morning. The hundreds of students participating in ISPP MUN 2019 assembled, bright-eyed and eager to argue the resolutions of the plenary, in their country delegations. This meant that delegates from different schools and ages would have the opportunity to interact with each other as representatives of the same nation. In awaiting the introduction of the day’s resolutions, the delegates did not seem intimidated by the sizable audience they would be speaking before. With the slam of the gavel, the Head Chair and Co-Chair brought the murmuring of students to settle and the echoes of delegates announcing “present and voting” slid around the theater.
Initially debated was the resolution of reducing inequality against the LGBTQ+ community in member states. The resolution proposed ways in which the UN will play an active role in fighting the discrimination felt by the LGBTQ+ community including social awareness campaigns and programs and the punishment of acts of prejudice and violence. It continued on to encourage member nations to support LGBTQ+ individuals and educate their citizens further on this. Points of information brought forward issues of nations refusing the integration of the community into their own societies, the relevance of communities suffering from other inequalities (ie. racism, gender inequality), and the difficulty in identifying hateful language. It was agreed by delegates that the resolution, as submitted, required an increase in specificity and closer attention to detail which could be determined in amendments and modifications. The amendments to clauses surfaced arguments about LGBTQ+ surgeries, balancing ideologies and issues of tolerance in opposed countries as well as financial implications of the resolution. Some delegates urged the pull of attention towards “more pressing issues” in reference to poverty and conflict in their nations. Representatives for the resolution promised the eventual acceptance of LGBTQ+ people as societal changes will take place in the natural course of the coming future. This was countered with the need to place emphasis on traditional values in an effort to maintain the utmost importance of sovereignty of nations. This debate, fueled by the passion and strength with which the speakers approached the resolution, continued with the back and forth of claims and arguments concerning LGBTQ+ community members for over an hour before the delegates voted. Due to so many conflicting clauses and controversial implications, the vote for the resolution was overwhelmed by the vote against the resolution. The constraints of time in this situation prevented the full extent of discussion on the subject. Although the resolution was not passed, this should not be seen as a failure; the discourse of this issue with such a wide scope of delegates and the consensus for the need for further development and detail in the resolution is an achievement in itself.
Following the first debate was the resolution covering the abolishment of child trafficking. This resolution brought up ideas of educating citizens about child trafficking, measures to take in order to protect vulnerable children, funding in order to support the aid of victims, the prosecution and investigation of offenders of child trafficking, programs to help the emotional and physical well-being of victims, and promoting awareness about child exploitation. The delegates advocating for this resolution indicated that offenders are educated to a degree where they should have knowledge that their actions are wrong. They further described the necessity of a subdivision of the UN to focus closely on child trafficking and issue more support and resources for this cause than currently shown. However, in the dispute of this clause, it was argued that creating another UN organization for this would undermine the work of UNICEF towards reducing child trafficking. Some nations were unaffected by the pull of moral authority in this conflict and asserted that the economic gains provided by cheap labor through child trafficking outweigh the detriments to children in these conditions. It was declared by one representative that as their “reputation had already been destroyed, member nations should focus on forward movements in the global economy.” Because of the flaws found by a number of delegates in this resolution, there was much disagreement over the approach to abolishing child trafficking and it was stated by some that the lack of time to make sufficient and effective amendments to such a problematic resolution meant that the resolution should not be passed at all. This appeared to be a prevalent view amongst delegates as the vast majority chose to abstain from a vote for or against the resolution. This led to the Chair’s decision to enforce a vote; there was to be a division of the house in which all members would vote. The conference concluded then with the denial of the resolution to pass.
Both resolutions were not passed, but this is because of the stimulating and powerful debate between delegates and the steadfast ideas and perspectives presented by various nations. Had there been more time, there could certainly have been further advances towards resolutions that would please and benefit all members and satisfy the need for more justice and equality internationally. This brought a strong and significant finish to the debates of delegates and the resolutions discussed in ISPP’s 8th annual MUN conference.
Initially debated was the resolution of reducing inequality against the LGBTQ+ community in member states. The resolution proposed ways in which the UN will play an active role in fighting the discrimination felt by the LGBTQ+ community including social awareness campaigns and programs and the punishment of acts of prejudice and violence. It continued on to encourage member nations to support LGBTQ+ individuals and educate their citizens further on this. Points of information brought forward issues of nations refusing the integration of the community into their own societies, the relevance of communities suffering from other inequalities (ie. racism, gender inequality), and the difficulty in identifying hateful language. It was agreed by delegates that the resolution, as submitted, required an increase in specificity and closer attention to detail which could be determined in amendments and modifications. The amendments to clauses surfaced arguments about LGBTQ+ surgeries, balancing ideologies and issues of tolerance in opposed countries as well as financial implications of the resolution. Some delegates urged the pull of attention towards “more pressing issues” in reference to poverty and conflict in their nations. Representatives for the resolution promised the eventual acceptance of LGBTQ+ people as societal changes will take place in the natural course of the coming future. This was countered with the need to place emphasis on traditional values in an effort to maintain the utmost importance of sovereignty of nations. This debate, fueled by the passion and strength with which the speakers approached the resolution, continued with the back and forth of claims and arguments concerning LGBTQ+ community members for over an hour before the delegates voted. Due to so many conflicting clauses and controversial implications, the vote for the resolution was overwhelmed by the vote against the resolution. The constraints of time in this situation prevented the full extent of discussion on the subject. Although the resolution was not passed, this should not be seen as a failure; the discourse of this issue with such a wide scope of delegates and the consensus for the need for further development and detail in the resolution is an achievement in itself.
Following the first debate was the resolution covering the abolishment of child trafficking. This resolution brought up ideas of educating citizens about child trafficking, measures to take in order to protect vulnerable children, funding in order to support the aid of victims, the prosecution and investigation of offenders of child trafficking, programs to help the emotional and physical well-being of victims, and promoting awareness about child exploitation. The delegates advocating for this resolution indicated that offenders are educated to a degree where they should have knowledge that their actions are wrong. They further described the necessity of a subdivision of the UN to focus closely on child trafficking and issue more support and resources for this cause than currently shown. However, in the dispute of this clause, it was argued that creating another UN organization for this would undermine the work of UNICEF towards reducing child trafficking. Some nations were unaffected by the pull of moral authority in this conflict and asserted that the economic gains provided by cheap labor through child trafficking outweigh the detriments to children in these conditions. It was declared by one representative that as their “reputation had already been destroyed, member nations should focus on forward movements in the global economy.” Because of the flaws found by a number of delegates in this resolution, there was much disagreement over the approach to abolishing child trafficking and it was stated by some that the lack of time to make sufficient and effective amendments to such a problematic resolution meant that the resolution should not be passed at all. This appeared to be a prevalent view amongst delegates as the vast majority chose to abstain from a vote for or against the resolution. This led to the Chair’s decision to enforce a vote; there was to be a division of the house in which all members would vote. The conference concluded then with the denial of the resolution to pass.
Both resolutions were not passed, but this is because of the stimulating and powerful debate between delegates and the steadfast ideas and perspectives presented by various nations. Had there been more time, there could certainly have been further advances towards resolutions that would please and benefit all members and satisfy the need for more justice and equality internationally. This brought a strong and significant finish to the debates of delegates and the resolutions discussed in ISPP’s 8th annual MUN conference.
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
Security Council
The delegates of Security Council (SC) brought forth endless waves of passionate debates, so much so that their debate extended further into the 3rd day of MUN. Despite a slew of fervent debating and endless veto threats, all 3 resolutions of SC (the situation in South Sudan, the situation in Kashmir, and the situation in Venezuela) were successfully passed.
The proceedings of the first resolution, the situation in South Sudan, created a very heated debate. So much so, that South Africa decided to take a stance and exit the committee room, being immensely disappointed at the fact that the committee had the gall to even discuss the use of capital punishment. As said by South Africa himself, “Nelson Mandela was against the barbaric capital punishment in the wonderful country of South Africa so when the Security Council, let alone the United Kingdom and France let a clause talking about capital punishment be even entertained at the Security Council. South Africa was extremely disappointed and decided when voting procedures came around, to stage a formal protest by walking out and then returning quite promptly to vote as it was important to vote on the matter as well.”
P5 caucuses were constantly being held to the point that there were mentions of one occurring for almost every clause voted on. The P5 nations became increasingly adamant about their ideas and their views being reflected in each and every clause of each and every resolution. Resulting in both the USA and China to exclaim, “The delegate does not believe a P5 caucus is necessary as the delegates will not change their mind either way.”
In the third resolution, the situation in Venezuela, the likes of Kuwait showed his nationalistic views in suggesting that currencies such as but not limited to the Kuwait Dinar to be used in Venezuelan to combat its ongoing hyperinflation. In justifying this, Kuwait cites that, “our currency is worth more than the USA.” This spur of nationalism leads to Peru doing the same thing, in posing an amendment to strike the Kuwait Dinar from the clause, but to then possibly add the Peru Nuevo Sol to the list instead. This, unfortunately, was highly discouraged by the chair as the Peru Nuevo Sol was at an even worse place than the Kuwait Dinar causing the delegate of Peru to, retract the point but maintain the feeling.”
The passion of all the delegates of SC was clearly displayed all throughout their session. From beginning to end, they maintained their high energy levels and persistence to see their side go through. With delegates such as South Africa, Indonesia, and Peru, always at a high energy level and ready to come up to the podium and state their points, there was never a dull moment in Security Council.
The proceedings of the first resolution, the situation in South Sudan, created a very heated debate. So much so, that South Africa decided to take a stance and exit the committee room, being immensely disappointed at the fact that the committee had the gall to even discuss the use of capital punishment. As said by South Africa himself, “Nelson Mandela was against the barbaric capital punishment in the wonderful country of South Africa so when the Security Council, let alone the United Kingdom and France let a clause talking about capital punishment be even entertained at the Security Council. South Africa was extremely disappointed and decided when voting procedures came around, to stage a formal protest by walking out and then returning quite promptly to vote as it was important to vote on the matter as well.”
P5 caucuses were constantly being held to the point that there were mentions of one occurring for almost every clause voted on. The P5 nations became increasingly adamant about their ideas and their views being reflected in each and every clause of each and every resolution. Resulting in both the USA and China to exclaim, “The delegate does not believe a P5 caucus is necessary as the delegates will not change their mind either way.”
In the third resolution, the situation in Venezuela, the likes of Kuwait showed his nationalistic views in suggesting that currencies such as but not limited to the Kuwait Dinar to be used in Venezuelan to combat its ongoing hyperinflation. In justifying this, Kuwait cites that, “our currency is worth more than the USA.” This spur of nationalism leads to Peru doing the same thing, in posing an amendment to strike the Kuwait Dinar from the clause, but to then possibly add the Peru Nuevo Sol to the list instead. This, unfortunately, was highly discouraged by the chair as the Peru Nuevo Sol was at an even worse place than the Kuwait Dinar causing the delegate of Peru to, retract the point but maintain the feeling.”
The passion of all the delegates of SC was clearly displayed all throughout their session. From beginning to end, they maintained their high energy levels and persistence to see their side go through. With delegates such as South Africa, Indonesia, and Peru, always at a high energy level and ready to come up to the podium and state their points, there was never a dull moment in Security Council.
Written by Viriyan Mak
Quiz Night |
Saturday’s quiz night event brought a much needed release from the stillness and formality of the conference rooms in which the hours of debating had stretched on into the dark of evening.The delegates shuffled into the Black Box, worn out by the day’s taxing journey to resolutions and moved to their groups, allocated by the admin.
Only hushed chatter could be heard before the trivia questions began. Our MCs, Vincent and Nurul, introduced the first round: ‘Blast from the Past!’ featuring questions about history from around the globe. The avid and quick deliberation within groups grew as the faces of the delegates lit up with excitement at each question. The event moved on to a second round: Literature and Film, demanding knowledge of pop culture which enticed the delegates further. The reveal of each question was met with a clamor of discussion and shouts of enthusiasm across the room in stark contrast with the atmosphere of committee rooms. The delegates relished in finally being able to express their emotions as they came and sat attentively awaiting the following round: maps and flags. The questions posed challenged the delegates well in a perfect cross between difficulty and ease. Tension grew with each question drawing nearer to the end and the building anticipation and energy could be seen in every delegate present. There was the familiar sensation of the answer being on the tip of your tongue and the desperation with which the delegates conversed pushed at the suspense of the event. In the final music round, there were murmurs of recognition intermingled with mumbles of confusion as snippets of songs were played for the teams. Some delegates had their eyebrows knit, distressed with the desire to guess correctly while others burst out with the joy of knowing they had the answer.
The trivia questions dwindled and finally the quiz portion of the night was over. The MCs revealed the correct answers to the questions which gave way to wild streaks of cheering and applause and simultaneous sighs of disappointment slithering around the theater. The points were being calculated by the organizing team, scribbling furiously at the front of the Black Box while the delegates grew tense and there was a looming tightness in the air. Silence consumed the hall. A bag of sweets was up for grabs and every team wanted it. At last, the results were in. Mr. Brown read out the points for each team, from the lowest up and there were outbursts of mixed emotions as he approached the winning team. When he got to the runner up, there was an audible shout of despair, soon overwhelmed by the intense enthusiasm of the winning team. Team number 12 had won and rushed to collect their goodies, applauded by all the other groups. The delegates walked out of the Black Box, still in good spirits and unwound from the seriousness of the debates, ready for a full night of sleep and the last day of the conference.
Only hushed chatter could be heard before the trivia questions began. Our MCs, Vincent and Nurul, introduced the first round: ‘Blast from the Past!’ featuring questions about history from around the globe. The avid and quick deliberation within groups grew as the faces of the delegates lit up with excitement at each question. The event moved on to a second round: Literature and Film, demanding knowledge of pop culture which enticed the delegates further. The reveal of each question was met with a clamor of discussion and shouts of enthusiasm across the room in stark contrast with the atmosphere of committee rooms. The delegates relished in finally being able to express their emotions as they came and sat attentively awaiting the following round: maps and flags. The questions posed challenged the delegates well in a perfect cross between difficulty and ease. Tension grew with each question drawing nearer to the end and the building anticipation and energy could be seen in every delegate present. There was the familiar sensation of the answer being on the tip of your tongue and the desperation with which the delegates conversed pushed at the suspense of the event. In the final music round, there were murmurs of recognition intermingled with mumbles of confusion as snippets of songs were played for the teams. Some delegates had their eyebrows knit, distressed with the desire to guess correctly while others burst out with the joy of knowing they had the answer.
The trivia questions dwindled and finally the quiz portion of the night was over. The MCs revealed the correct answers to the questions which gave way to wild streaks of cheering and applause and simultaneous sighs of disappointment slithering around the theater. The points were being calculated by the organizing team, scribbling furiously at the front of the Black Box while the delegates grew tense and there was a looming tightness in the air. Silence consumed the hall. A bag of sweets was up for grabs and every team wanted it. At last, the results were in. Mr. Brown read out the points for each team, from the lowest up and there were outbursts of mixed emotions as he approached the winning team. When he got to the runner up, there was an audible shout of despair, soon overwhelmed by the intense enthusiasm of the winning team. Team number 12 had won and rushed to collect their goodies, applauded by all the other groups. The delegates walked out of the Black Box, still in good spirits and unwound from the seriousness of the debates, ready for a full night of sleep and the last day of the conference.
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
Junior General Assembly 2
Despite this conference being their first MUN experience, many delegates of JGA2 were very proactive in the debate and ready to take action. With Finland having 9 total speeches and 25 total POIs, and the likes of USA and China having 22 POIs, it is clear to see that their lack of experience did not stop them from taking risks. In fact, it can be said they were pushing their authority to pass motions a tad bit. Being in a Junior Assembly allowed the delegates to experience discussing a variety of topics, giving the opportunity to explore new ideas and find the one that they are most passionate in. All 3 resolutions (equal access to education, moving towards sustainable energy sources, and government censorship of social media) were able to successfully pass.
In discussing equal access to education, the logistics of this were taken into consideration. Both mental and physical struggles of children were taken into consideration to determine the necessary action to be taken to overcome this challenge. Additionally, the issue of children being barred from attending school in the first place, either due to financial struggles or upholding traditional customs were considered.
When discussing the second resolution, the impacts, both positive and negative, of nuclear power plants as an energy source were discussed. In this, there was merit found in nuclear power’s ability to effectively provide electricity, more so than other energy sources such as coal. However, this comes at the risk of potential catastrophic disasters that although very rarely occur, have immensely negative consequences when they do.
The delegates of JGA2 showcased a respectful and collaborative attitude towards both their chairs and their delegates. They’ve showcased clear drive and passion and with time, their skills will be further refined as they prepare to move up to elder conferences.
In discussing equal access to education, the logistics of this were taken into consideration. Both mental and physical struggles of children were taken into consideration to determine the necessary action to be taken to overcome this challenge. Additionally, the issue of children being barred from attending school in the first place, either due to financial struggles or upholding traditional customs were considered.
When discussing the second resolution, the impacts, both positive and negative, of nuclear power plants as an energy source were discussed. In this, there was merit found in nuclear power’s ability to effectively provide electricity, more so than other energy sources such as coal. However, this comes at the risk of potential catastrophic disasters that although very rarely occur, have immensely negative consequences when they do.
The delegates of JGA2 showcased a respectful and collaborative attitude towards both their chairs and their delegates. They’ve showcased clear drive and passion and with time, their skills will be further refined as they prepare to move up to elder conferences.
Written by Viriyan Mak
Junior General Assembly 1
Delegates of JGA1 brought forth and entertaining and memorable debate in their proactiveness and readiness to debate for their side. As a Junior assembly, the topics they covered were of a wider scope, allowing them to get a taste of what is in store in the elder conferences where more specialized issues are discussed. Of the 3 resolutions covered (reforestation, militarization of space, and inequality towards the LGBTQ+ community), all but one resolution passed.
The 2nd resolution which, despite having not passed, brought forth a buzz of debate as the likes of Bulgaria and Saudi Arabia pressed on for the passing of a resolution going against the rights of the LGBTQ+ community, and looking to segregate and punish those found to be a part of said community. WIth clauses looking to abolish Pride Day or fine those who wish to marry a partner of the same sex, the committee became split as the two sides were set on their values.
Upon conducting an interview with Bulgaria and Saudi Arabia, statements were made by them to further clarify their stance on this resolution
“The delegate of Bulgaria believes that LGBTQ+ people should not have the same rights as straight/normal people because they shouldn’t be considered as actual human beings who contribute to society.”
“The delegate of Saudi Arabia strongly urges everyone to realize the great disease the LGBTQ+ people have. Their minds can intoxicate you and turn you to question yourself. Watch out. LGTQ+ people intoxicate our world.”
It is clear to see that delegates such as Bulgaria and Saudi Arabia made for an enjoyable conference for both themselves and other attendees by taking the challenge of playing the role of devil’s advocate in going against an idea, that in today’s day and age is heavily supported. These delegates, very obviously, in their personal lives do not follow the same views as their delegate role in MUN, however deciding to follow through with this as it “would be a good twist and fun to get in the mood [for MUN] to have fun.” Overall, the risk-taking attitude of this committee poses great possibility for what may be to come in the plenary and in future MUNs.
The 2nd resolution which, despite having not passed, brought forth a buzz of debate as the likes of Bulgaria and Saudi Arabia pressed on for the passing of a resolution going against the rights of the LGBTQ+ community, and looking to segregate and punish those found to be a part of said community. WIth clauses looking to abolish Pride Day or fine those who wish to marry a partner of the same sex, the committee became split as the two sides were set on their values.
Upon conducting an interview with Bulgaria and Saudi Arabia, statements were made by them to further clarify their stance on this resolution
“The delegate of Bulgaria believes that LGBTQ+ people should not have the same rights as straight/normal people because they shouldn’t be considered as actual human beings who contribute to society.”
“The delegate of Saudi Arabia strongly urges everyone to realize the great disease the LGBTQ+ people have. Their minds can intoxicate you and turn you to question yourself. Watch out. LGTQ+ people intoxicate our world.”
It is clear to see that delegates such as Bulgaria and Saudi Arabia made for an enjoyable conference for both themselves and other attendees by taking the challenge of playing the role of devil’s advocate in going against an idea, that in today’s day and age is heavily supported. These delegates, very obviously, in their personal lives do not follow the same views as their delegate role in MUN, however deciding to follow through with this as it “would be a good twist and fun to get in the mood [for MUN] to have fun.” Overall, the risk-taking attitude of this committee poses great possibility for what may be to come in the plenary and in future MUNs.
Written by Viriyan Mak
Human Rights Council
HRC, the Human Rights Council, consisted of delegates with a drive towards ensuring the rights and protection of all humans across the globe. This committee had a wide range of delegates. With delegates such as Qatar with a remarkable 4 speeches, 33 POIs, and 2 amendments, HRC made for a committee ripe with fruitful debates. The 4 resolutions at hand all passed successfully.
The proceedings of the first resolution (equal access to education) sparked a heated debate between the delegates of Ukraine and Qatar as the case of providing technology and other appropriate materials to students was made. Additionally, discussions concerning the responsibilities of MEDCs to provide aid to LEDCs concerning this matter were made.
The third resolution brought on forced marriage brought forth passionate speakers such as the delegate of India. The delegate of India brought forth a clause employing nations to imprison parents who force their kids to marry for up to 20 years. Such an extreme punishment was fervently debated for by India and ultimately was allowed to pass with the passing of the resolution as a whole. India justified this clause by explaining that “they [the parents] should know what they are commending their child to, and what will most likely happen to them after that.” Citing that, “this could also be seen as abuse against the child.”
With this, HRC showcased a clear drive towards ensuring that vulnerable citizens were attended to and that immoral actions were to be appropriately punished to meet the caliber of the crime.
The proceedings of the first resolution (equal access to education) sparked a heated debate between the delegates of Ukraine and Qatar as the case of providing technology and other appropriate materials to students was made. Additionally, discussions concerning the responsibilities of MEDCs to provide aid to LEDCs concerning this matter were made.
The third resolution brought on forced marriage brought forth passionate speakers such as the delegate of India. The delegate of India brought forth a clause employing nations to imprison parents who force their kids to marry for up to 20 years. Such an extreme punishment was fervently debated for by India and ultimately was allowed to pass with the passing of the resolution as a whole. India justified this clause by explaining that “they [the parents] should know what they are commending their child to, and what will most likely happen to them after that.” Citing that, “this could also be seen as abuse against the child.”
With this, HRC showcased a clear drive towards ensuring that vulnerable citizens were attended to and that immoral actions were to be appropriately punished to meet the caliber of the crime.
Written by Viriyan Mak
Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific
The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific will be making resolutions for the question of democracy and stability in South-East Asia, the question of the implications of China’s Belt and Road policy, and the question of abolishing child trafficking.
DEBATES:
The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific focused on China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the implications it has for the member states as well as working towards abolishing child trafficking and democracy and stability.
The Belt and Road Initiative resolution discussed in detail the implications of trading consumable goods between countries with largely different religions and cultural approaches. Because of this controversy, it was found important to avoid conflict in any scenario such as discrimination within countries. The taxation of these goods was also debated and the idea that governments tax solely in an attempt to increase revenue and without necessity was put forward. Delegates promoted the transparency in domestic and multinational corporations and further scrutiny by international accounting firms. The discussion of these issues allowed changes to be made to the resolution as amendments were passed to improve and advance.
The democracy and sustainability resolution, concerning South East Asia, regarded the role of the UN in elections and government and ensuring fairness and equality in them. Delegates made amendments that stimulated debate on parliamentary election as well as efforts to maintain transparency.
Perhaps one of the resolutions that brought the most conflict to this conference was the child trafficking resolution, submitted by the delegate of the Philippines. Some delegates declared that the moral obligation in this situation outweighs the benefits of child labor as a cheap solution. It was stated that the use of children in manual labor and the manufacturing of clothing is acceptable as “a last resort” in the eyes of certain nations, particularly those that actively employed children and profited from this inexpensive labor. Other delegates pulled at the ethical implications of this and detailed the painful conditions of these work environments and unfair treatment of these children. A powerful counter argument was made against the pro-trafficking delegates: the employ of children and thereby the denial of education is not economically sustainable in terms of creating opportunities for future work and prosperity of careers.
The moment that came as a shock to all of the delegates and snaked its way around the entire conference in murmurs of perplexion was when the delegate of the Philippines, having submitted the resolution to abolish child trafficking herself, opposed the resolution. In her speech following this, she openly refuted all of her earlier statements and disagreed with the clauses indicated in the resolution, to the confusion of her fellow delegates. However, as the debate of this resolution came to a close, she retracted her opposition, revealing that it was a tactic to stimulate debate and continued, “The delegate of the Philippines would like the house to vote for this amendment as a whole. During the speeches made and the amendments submitted, the resolution is at a place where it is approved thanks to the efforts of the delegates within this committee. The resolution does tackle huge and ongoing global conflict. This won’t be solved overnight nor will this be easy. The delegate of the Philippines believes that this resolution will get one step closer to a world where child trafficking is no longer a looming threat. Through making a new organization that solely focuses on combating these problems, to educate parents and children on this issue, the issue of child trafficking will reduce significantly. There is no reason for delegates to vote against this resolution. If there is any reason, the delegate believes that those voting against represent heartless countries that only care about easy ways to make profit and not the livelihood of the children.”
Upon hearing this, the delegate of Cambodia countered, “Does the delegate recognize that she has lost the respect of many delegates due to her previous speech?”
The delegate of the Philippines approached this with little remorse or worry, and did, in fact, manage to receive the majority vote in order for the resolution to pass. In a later interview the delegate explained, “It was because over half of the conference itself was mainly new delegates. During the break the delegate of the Philippines and a few other delegates, and the chair said ‘why not go against this resolution as a whole’ and that will hopefully encourage other delegates to talk.”
She stood by her decision, saying it made the debate “a lot more fun” and made for memorable moments in the conference. In spite of the controversy and shock this tactic raised amongst delegates, the delegate of the Philippines was successful and introduced a different approach to achieving resolutions (perhaps not entirely suitable for the UN).
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
DEBATES:
The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific focused on China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the implications it has for the member states as well as working towards abolishing child trafficking and democracy and stability.
The Belt and Road Initiative resolution discussed in detail the implications of trading consumable goods between countries with largely different religions and cultural approaches. Because of this controversy, it was found important to avoid conflict in any scenario such as discrimination within countries. The taxation of these goods was also debated and the idea that governments tax solely in an attempt to increase revenue and without necessity was put forward. Delegates promoted the transparency in domestic and multinational corporations and further scrutiny by international accounting firms. The discussion of these issues allowed changes to be made to the resolution as amendments were passed to improve and advance.
The democracy and sustainability resolution, concerning South East Asia, regarded the role of the UN in elections and government and ensuring fairness and equality in them. Delegates made amendments that stimulated debate on parliamentary election as well as efforts to maintain transparency.
Perhaps one of the resolutions that brought the most conflict to this conference was the child trafficking resolution, submitted by the delegate of the Philippines. Some delegates declared that the moral obligation in this situation outweighs the benefits of child labor as a cheap solution. It was stated that the use of children in manual labor and the manufacturing of clothing is acceptable as “a last resort” in the eyes of certain nations, particularly those that actively employed children and profited from this inexpensive labor. Other delegates pulled at the ethical implications of this and detailed the painful conditions of these work environments and unfair treatment of these children. A powerful counter argument was made against the pro-trafficking delegates: the employ of children and thereby the denial of education is not economically sustainable in terms of creating opportunities for future work and prosperity of careers.
The moment that came as a shock to all of the delegates and snaked its way around the entire conference in murmurs of perplexion was when the delegate of the Philippines, having submitted the resolution to abolish child trafficking herself, opposed the resolution. In her speech following this, she openly refuted all of her earlier statements and disagreed with the clauses indicated in the resolution, to the confusion of her fellow delegates. However, as the debate of this resolution came to a close, she retracted her opposition, revealing that it was a tactic to stimulate debate and continued, “The delegate of the Philippines would like the house to vote for this amendment as a whole. During the speeches made and the amendments submitted, the resolution is at a place where it is approved thanks to the efforts of the delegates within this committee. The resolution does tackle huge and ongoing global conflict. This won’t be solved overnight nor will this be easy. The delegate of the Philippines believes that this resolution will get one step closer to a world where child trafficking is no longer a looming threat. Through making a new organization that solely focuses on combating these problems, to educate parents and children on this issue, the issue of child trafficking will reduce significantly. There is no reason for delegates to vote against this resolution. If there is any reason, the delegate believes that those voting against represent heartless countries that only care about easy ways to make profit and not the livelihood of the children.”
Upon hearing this, the delegate of Cambodia countered, “Does the delegate recognize that she has lost the respect of many delegates due to her previous speech?”
The delegate of the Philippines approached this with little remorse or worry, and did, in fact, manage to receive the majority vote in order for the resolution to pass. In a later interview the delegate explained, “It was because over half of the conference itself was mainly new delegates. During the break the delegate of the Philippines and a few other delegates, and the chair said ‘why not go against this resolution as a whole’ and that will hopefully encourage other delegates to talk.”
She stood by her decision, saying it made the debate “a lot more fun” and made for memorable moments in the conference. In spite of the controversy and shock this tactic raised amongst delegates, the delegate of the Philippines was successful and introduced a different approach to achieving resolutions (perhaps not entirely suitable for the UN).
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
- “If clothing brands did not exist, clothing brands such as H&M would not be as well known as they are now.”
- “Children slip under the radar and are used because they are seen as easy to manage.”
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
Economic and Social Council
ECOSOC as the Economic and Social Council worked towards solving issues pertaining to economics and social causes as its name implies. The delegates of this conference were proactive in the debate allowing all 3 of the resolutions (improving maternity care in low-income countries, moving towards sustainable energy sources, and addressing problems related to youth bulges in post-conflict countries) of this committee to pass successfully.
As the third resolution: moving towards sustainable energy sources, proceeded, concerns over the usage of uranium as an energy source was discussed. Concerns were made over the possibility of creating nuclear weapons and the detriments of nuclear waste. With delegates such as Ghana citing Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster as an instance of the catastrophic nature of uranium.
The delegate of Venezuela was a standout delegate making remarkable claims in favor of his own nation’s success; placing his nation and its citizens above all else. With his insistence on “the perfect views of socialism” and on Venezuela having “superiority above all nations,” it became clear that the debate had come to be the World vs Venezuela.
“It is inherently true that Venezuelans are superior to other races and it is as apparent as the idea that using a computer is more efficient than using a pencil and paper”
Upon conducting an interview, such statements were made by Venezuela as justification for his decision to take on this proactive radical role.
“I wanted to see how well I could defend an argument that I didn’t believe and I think that’s the point of MUN, but I took it to an extreme. I also had fun while doing it and I believe it made the conference an enjoyable experience for everyone else as well.”
Venezuela remarks that “I wish at least one person would do this per committee to make this experience more fun for everybody and it could be beneficial for helping people grow their speaking skills.”
All in all, ECOSOC was alive with discussion and debate allowing for an eventual conclusion to be made with all resolutions in an appropriate yet entertaining manner.
As the third resolution: moving towards sustainable energy sources, proceeded, concerns over the usage of uranium as an energy source was discussed. Concerns were made over the possibility of creating nuclear weapons and the detriments of nuclear waste. With delegates such as Ghana citing Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster as an instance of the catastrophic nature of uranium.
The delegate of Venezuela was a standout delegate making remarkable claims in favor of his own nation’s success; placing his nation and its citizens above all else. With his insistence on “the perfect views of socialism” and on Venezuela having “superiority above all nations,” it became clear that the debate had come to be the World vs Venezuela.
“It is inherently true that Venezuelans are superior to other races and it is as apparent as the idea that using a computer is more efficient than using a pencil and paper”
Upon conducting an interview, such statements were made by Venezuela as justification for his decision to take on this proactive radical role.
“I wanted to see how well I could defend an argument that I didn’t believe and I think that’s the point of MUN, but I took it to an extreme. I also had fun while doing it and I believe it made the conference an enjoyable experience for everyone else as well.”
Venezuela remarks that “I wish at least one person would do this per committee to make this experience more fun for everybody and it could be beneficial for helping people grow their speaking skills.”
All in all, ECOSOC was alive with discussion and debate allowing for an eventual conclusion to be made with all resolutions in an appropriate yet entertaining manner.
Written by Viriyan Mak
Environmental Council
As its name entails, EC was all about discussing environmental issues and actions to be taken to ensure a sustainable future. In this committee, the delegates took on a very serious and focused attitude, with ample participation from both ends of the argument. Despite times of opposition or disagreement, all 4 resolutions successfully passed showcasing the diplomatic attitude of EC’s delegates.
The discussion of the 2nd resolution: developing a global green economy, consisted of talks such as the implementation of a carbon tax on companies as an incentive to reduce their carbon emissions. Delegates showcased their eagerness to speak, with a consistent flow of POIs and amendments coming in one after another, all in the name of improving the world’s environment.
Most interestingly, despite China’s apparent negative contributions towards the environment, they showcased a drive towards reversing their actions and taking a stand for the implementation of a global green economy.
Despite a lull in energy after lunch, they slowly began to pick up the pace again in moving towards their new resolution. All in all, EC showcased a diplomatic and serious attitude as they efficiently, yet thoroughly went through the clauses of each resolution, ensuring that everything was up to the standard of all delegates.
The discussion of the 2nd resolution: developing a global green economy, consisted of talks such as the implementation of a carbon tax on companies as an incentive to reduce their carbon emissions. Delegates showcased their eagerness to speak, with a consistent flow of POIs and amendments coming in one after another, all in the name of improving the world’s environment.
Most interestingly, despite China’s apparent negative contributions towards the environment, they showcased a drive towards reversing their actions and taking a stand for the implementation of a global green economy.
Despite a lull in energy after lunch, they slowly began to pick up the pace again in moving towards their new resolution. All in all, EC showcased a diplomatic and serious attitude as they efficiently, yet thoroughly went through the clauses of each resolution, ensuring that everything was up to the standard of all delegates.
Written by Viriyan Mak
General Assembly 4
In General Assembly 4, the Partnerships for the Goals committee will be focusing on Sustainable Goal #17, debating the question of militarization of space, the question of the right to privacy from mass surveillance, and the question of reducing violence between Israel and Palestine.
DEBATES
In GA4, the resolutions in accordance as well as against the right to privacy from mass surveillance were debated, the approach towards militarization of space and satellites, and finally the measures discussed to reduce violence between Palestine and Israel.
The delegates first argued for the right to privacy from mass surveillance conducted by the governments of the member states. This resolution investigated the advantages and disadvantages to mass surveillance, and both the privacy and security privileges and violations it provides. The delegates associated the pride and desire to be seen in terrorists with their use of social media. Delegates also debated a resolution against a right to privacy from mass surveillance, indicating the benefits of online surveillance in order to protect citizens and laws that could be implemented to do so. The resolution highly recommended that nations, corporations and companies create privacy policies detailed on websites and social media platforms.
The Israel and Palestine Resolution was deeply controversial and conflicting opinions were drawn in. The dispute between the countries over Jerusalem, a place of cultural and historical significance to both, caused much violence and criminal acts. The resolution asserted that there be the implementation of a cease fire and the withdrawal of Israel. In addition, a strong solution was to activate a new organization of the UN: the United Nations High Commissioner for Peace in Israel and Palestine (UNHCPIP) which would oversee the movements towards peace between the parties by patrolling borders and organizing refugee centers. The resolution also declared the necessity for Palestine to be recognized as a sovereign state and the possibility of separating Jerusalem into two regions under the supervision of the UN to satisfy Israel and Palestine. This was met with some agreement and disagreement from the other delegates.
The resolution on the militarization of space was approached with an aim to disarm satellites and prevent the weaponizing of spacecrafts and technology. The delegates stated that there should be penalizations and condemning of countries producing and testing armed satellites. Furthermore, anti-satellite weapons and technologies harming or disrupting spacecrafts must be regulated and an international coalition should be created to monitor development of armed satellites and anti-satellite missiles. There were countries with reason to object and who advocated for opposing arguments in the militarization of space.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
DEBATES
In GA4, the resolutions in accordance as well as against the right to privacy from mass surveillance were debated, the approach towards militarization of space and satellites, and finally the measures discussed to reduce violence between Palestine and Israel.
The delegates first argued for the right to privacy from mass surveillance conducted by the governments of the member states. This resolution investigated the advantages and disadvantages to mass surveillance, and both the privacy and security privileges and violations it provides. The delegates associated the pride and desire to be seen in terrorists with their use of social media. Delegates also debated a resolution against a right to privacy from mass surveillance, indicating the benefits of online surveillance in order to protect citizens and laws that could be implemented to do so. The resolution highly recommended that nations, corporations and companies create privacy policies detailed on websites and social media platforms.
The Israel and Palestine Resolution was deeply controversial and conflicting opinions were drawn in. The dispute between the countries over Jerusalem, a place of cultural and historical significance to both, caused much violence and criminal acts. The resolution asserted that there be the implementation of a cease fire and the withdrawal of Israel. In addition, a strong solution was to activate a new organization of the UN: the United Nations High Commissioner for Peace in Israel and Palestine (UNHCPIP) which would oversee the movements towards peace between the parties by patrolling borders and organizing refugee centers. The resolution also declared the necessity for Palestine to be recognized as a sovereign state and the possibility of separating Jerusalem into two regions under the supervision of the UN to satisfy Israel and Palestine. This was met with some agreement and disagreement from the other delegates.
The resolution on the militarization of space was approached with an aim to disarm satellites and prevent the weaponizing of spacecrafts and technology. The delegates stated that there should be penalizations and condemning of countries producing and testing armed satellites. Furthermore, anti-satellite weapons and technologies harming or disrupting spacecrafts must be regulated and an international coalition should be created to monitor development of armed satellites and anti-satellite missiles. There were countries with reason to object and who advocated for opposing arguments in the militarization of space.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
- “To stand by and let these acts happen would be a crime in itself.”
- “How are police and peace keepers to know what is suspicious without surveillance?”
- “The prevalence of crime and terrorism should encourages mass surveillance.”
- “All governments should be able to monitor social media platforms to prevent terrorism.”
- “We, as the UN, are responsible for the livelihoods and safety of citizens.”
- “In the spirit of progress, it would be most beneficial to support this resolution.”
- “This should be looked at from an objective position; support of this resolution is to the detriment of no parties involved, except those with malicious intent.”
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
General Assembly 3
General Assembly 3, the Social, Cultural and Humanitarian Committee looking at Sustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced Inequalities, will be debating the question of reducing inequality towards the LGBTQ+ community, the question of representation of youth in government and the question of government censorship of social media.
DEBATES:
In the Social, Cultural and Humanitarian Committee, there was much heated and rapid debate over the representation of youth in government, the for and against resolutions to reduce inequality of the LGBTQ+ community and the censorship of social media.
GA3 was in considerable agreement in the discussion of allowing youths to be represented in governments, and conflict prevention and resolution by youths. Amendments included the identification of unfeasible and impossible clauses that forced member states and their governments to “spread themselves thin in trying to do them all at once” and brought a more realistic approach to youth in government. Nonetheless, the delegates were able to converge on an innovative solution to target the issue at hand.
A controversial debate followed the introduction of the LGBTQ+ resolutions as a result of the delicate history of discrimination and prejudice received by this community. The delegates faced the complex challenge of dealing with remaining intolerance held towards LGBTQ+ individuals in relation to traditional and religious values in different cultures with professionalism and understanding. They posed many solutions and suggestions, while recognizing progression in liberal ideals and standards that have allowed for the current freedom of the LGBTQ+ community in certain places. The committee was able to pull from what has occurred in history and apply it to the present societal climate in order to work towards resolutions that would benefit people from different countries and backgrounds but shared in the aim to reduce inequality. In censorship of media and the discussion of the resolution, the delegates looked at terrorism and how it is integrated in social media. Therefore, they encouraged social media companies and platforms to take precautions and take measures to prevent the use of the internet by terrorists.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
DEBATES:
In the Social, Cultural and Humanitarian Committee, there was much heated and rapid debate over the representation of youth in government, the for and against resolutions to reduce inequality of the LGBTQ+ community and the censorship of social media.
GA3 was in considerable agreement in the discussion of allowing youths to be represented in governments, and conflict prevention and resolution by youths. Amendments included the identification of unfeasible and impossible clauses that forced member states and their governments to “spread themselves thin in trying to do them all at once” and brought a more realistic approach to youth in government. Nonetheless, the delegates were able to converge on an innovative solution to target the issue at hand.
A controversial debate followed the introduction of the LGBTQ+ resolutions as a result of the delicate history of discrimination and prejudice received by this community. The delegates faced the complex challenge of dealing with remaining intolerance held towards LGBTQ+ individuals in relation to traditional and religious values in different cultures with professionalism and understanding. They posed many solutions and suggestions, while recognizing progression in liberal ideals and standards that have allowed for the current freedom of the LGBTQ+ community in certain places. The committee was able to pull from what has occurred in history and apply it to the present societal climate in order to work towards resolutions that would benefit people from different countries and backgrounds but shared in the aim to reduce inequality. In censorship of media and the discussion of the resolution, the delegates looked at terrorism and how it is integrated in social media. Therefore, they encouraged social media companies and platforms to take precautions and take measures to prevent the use of the internet by terrorists.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
- “Governments can help youths achieve their full potential and flourish in our current society.”
- “Adults and youths are living in two different worlds.”
- “Educating youths and allowing them to become future leaders is crucial.”
- “Rather than imposing a progressive movement at once, it should be introduced slowly to account for traditional beliefs.”
- “All nations can enforce the resolution at their own pace, the delegate acknowledges that different cultures take time to accept this.”
- “Open expression is a sign of improvement when taking into consideration that Saudi Arabia and its views for example towards the LGBTQ+ community in comparison to the Netherlands are quite different, so by implementing this in society, does the delegate not think that this is a massive improvement, whereas to say as of right now it would be silenced?”
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
General Assembly 2
General Assembly 2, the Economic and Financial Committee, working under the Sustainable Development Goal #8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, will be discussing the question of the automation of jobs, the question of investing in agricultural technology for sustainable development, and the question of providing fair job opportunities for youth.
DEBATES:
GA2, the Economic and Financial Committee, presented two resolutions in response to the question of investing in agricultural technology for sustainable development as well as options for providing fair job opportunities for youth and the effectiveness of implementing the automation of jobs in member states.
In the first resolutions, it was asserted that through the advancements of technology in agriculture, various economic benefits would be seen, particularly with respect to sustainability and maintaining steady economies for the future. The ideas in this resolution were further developed through the valuable points of interest amongst the various delegates in this committee. It was posed by the delegates that LEDCs, a group significantly affected by these changes in economic policies and very relevant in this general assembly, could be aided in this resolution because of the agricultural prosperity that would follow a technological push. This resolution was linked to various other SDGs, furthering the necessity for the implementation of technology in agriculture. Some delegates urged the education of farmers while others protested the enforcement of the resolution and questioned funding and costs.
The resolution of the automation of jobs across the member states was surrounded by animation and intrigue by the delegates. During the debate, the submitters weathered various counter arguments from other member nations. One clause invited the automation of jobs, particularly high-risk jobs and indicated that in replacing people with machines, fewer lives across the world would be lost due to work environments like mines. Issues that were also brought up included the displacement of workers by automation, taxation in order to allow automation and the implementation of renewable energy sources in order to maintain environmental sustainability. It was stated that although manual laborers and workers for menial jobs would be replaced, there would be an incentive for individuals to engage in more demanding, higher-level creative work. Delegates were thereby able to transform initially negative implications of resolutions into greater opportunities to support the economy seen in a more sustainable light. The resolution for creating fair jobs for youth became more heated and animated; delegates stood before their fellow nations and in unshaking voices, issued amendments and alterations to the resolution’s clauses about long-term and short-term internships or tailoring education towards specialized employment to meet industrial demands.
In this assembly, there was fluctuation between the agreement and unification of ideals held by the delegates, and the clashes in perspectives. This kept the delegates focused and captivated with the important issues at hand and assured the movement towards the most effective resolutions achievable. The echoes of delegates seconding and objecting motions filled the room, building the tension and excitement of the debate and the burst of applause as a resolution was passed gave release to the deeply engaged delegates.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
DEBATES:
GA2, the Economic and Financial Committee, presented two resolutions in response to the question of investing in agricultural technology for sustainable development as well as options for providing fair job opportunities for youth and the effectiveness of implementing the automation of jobs in member states.
In the first resolutions, it was asserted that through the advancements of technology in agriculture, various economic benefits would be seen, particularly with respect to sustainability and maintaining steady economies for the future. The ideas in this resolution were further developed through the valuable points of interest amongst the various delegates in this committee. It was posed by the delegates that LEDCs, a group significantly affected by these changes in economic policies and very relevant in this general assembly, could be aided in this resolution because of the agricultural prosperity that would follow a technological push. This resolution was linked to various other SDGs, furthering the necessity for the implementation of technology in agriculture. Some delegates urged the education of farmers while others protested the enforcement of the resolution and questioned funding and costs.
The resolution of the automation of jobs across the member states was surrounded by animation and intrigue by the delegates. During the debate, the submitters weathered various counter arguments from other member nations. One clause invited the automation of jobs, particularly high-risk jobs and indicated that in replacing people with machines, fewer lives across the world would be lost due to work environments like mines. Issues that were also brought up included the displacement of workers by automation, taxation in order to allow automation and the implementation of renewable energy sources in order to maintain environmental sustainability. It was stated that although manual laborers and workers for menial jobs would be replaced, there would be an incentive for individuals to engage in more demanding, higher-level creative work. Delegates were thereby able to transform initially negative implications of resolutions into greater opportunities to support the economy seen in a more sustainable light. The resolution for creating fair jobs for youth became more heated and animated; delegates stood before their fellow nations and in unshaking voices, issued amendments and alterations to the resolution’s clauses about long-term and short-term internships or tailoring education towards specialized employment to meet industrial demands.
In this assembly, there was fluctuation between the agreement and unification of ideals held by the delegates, and the clashes in perspectives. This kept the delegates focused and captivated with the important issues at hand and assured the movement towards the most effective resolutions achievable. The echoes of delegates seconding and objecting motions filled the room, building the tension and excitement of the debate and the burst of applause as a resolution was passed gave release to the deeply engaged delegates.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
- “By investing in agricultural technology, LEDCs will be able to profit and develop into MEDC’s.”
- “This proposes sustainable development not only for the economy but for the environment through efficient and renewable energy.”
- “As shown by various points of view, we see that this resolution meets the requirements of countries with a wide spectrum of differences.”
- “This resolution will create a wider range of jobs not replaced as easily.”
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
General Assembly 1
In General Assembly 1, the committee is discussing Disarmament and International Security in regards to Sustainable Development Goal #16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Under this falls the question of regulating the production of nuclear weapons, the question of cyber attacks by foreign countries, and the question of preventing youth fighting in armed conflicts.
DEBATES:
In GA1, the debates under Disarmament and International Security regarded the regulation of the production of nuclear weapons amongst the member states, the issue of cyber attacks by foreign countries and the prevention of youth soldiers.
Two resolutions were put forward under nuclear weaponry, in which delegates suggested resolutions and ideas that could lead to further safety and disarmament between nations such as the imposition of economic sanctions on those who violate agreed-upon treaties and conventions in order to apply stronger pressure to control nuclear arms. Delegates also argued that the member states reallocate funds and resources that are currently put towards nuclear weapons to ‘bigger issues’ including other sustainable development goals that hold higher significance and relevance. One resolution also suggested that the member nations that harvest uranium should inhibit sales to recognized nuclear states and that existing treaties regarding nuclear weapons be modified. Disputes that ensued in this committee, stirring passion and excitement in the delegates, included raising the issue of the impracticality of aiming for complete eradication of all nuclear material throughout the member states. It was stated that the full transparency of member states is unachievable and it is unreasonable to demand this of all member states. The delegates moved on to emphasize the significance of the main goal of this resolution: downsizing and reducing the proliferation of nuclear production and stocks.
In later resolutions, GA1 discussed cyber attacks by foreign countries which involved clauses such as education on internet usage through safety precautions, youth programs and public awareness campaigns as well as developing and strengthening cyber security. This approach to disarmament and international security was debated effectively and impactfully by this committee.
Through this discussion, all delegates were attentive and alert in the arguments put forward by the speakers and various countries were involved in introducing points of information in response to speeches made regarding the resolution. Across the room, the vigorous jotting of notes and the keen expressions of strong delegates brought an air of anticipation and hope for successful resolutions.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
DEBATES:
In GA1, the debates under Disarmament and International Security regarded the regulation of the production of nuclear weapons amongst the member states, the issue of cyber attacks by foreign countries and the prevention of youth soldiers.
Two resolutions were put forward under nuclear weaponry, in which delegates suggested resolutions and ideas that could lead to further safety and disarmament between nations such as the imposition of economic sanctions on those who violate agreed-upon treaties and conventions in order to apply stronger pressure to control nuclear arms. Delegates also argued that the member states reallocate funds and resources that are currently put towards nuclear weapons to ‘bigger issues’ including other sustainable development goals that hold higher significance and relevance. One resolution also suggested that the member nations that harvest uranium should inhibit sales to recognized nuclear states and that existing treaties regarding nuclear weapons be modified. Disputes that ensued in this committee, stirring passion and excitement in the delegates, included raising the issue of the impracticality of aiming for complete eradication of all nuclear material throughout the member states. It was stated that the full transparency of member states is unachievable and it is unreasonable to demand this of all member states. The delegates moved on to emphasize the significance of the main goal of this resolution: downsizing and reducing the proliferation of nuclear production and stocks.
In later resolutions, GA1 discussed cyber attacks by foreign countries which involved clauses such as education on internet usage through safety precautions, youth programs and public awareness campaigns as well as developing and strengthening cyber security. This approach to disarmament and international security was debated effectively and impactfully by this committee.
Through this discussion, all delegates were attentive and alert in the arguments put forward by the speakers and various countries were involved in introducing points of information in response to speeches made regarding the resolution. Across the room, the vigorous jotting of notes and the keen expressions of strong delegates brought an air of anticipation and hope for successful resolutions.
QUOTES FROM THE DELEGATES:
- “Country states may fear losing an upper edge by divulging this information.”
- “Eradicating nuclear weapons is unrealistic and infeasible.”
- “This resolution proposes to allocate money towards a good cause as a win-win situation.”
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
Lobbying: EC, ECOSOC, HRC, JGA1, JGA2, SC
As lobbying proceeds, the conferences are alive with the conversations of working delegates, with like minds grouped together working on a single resolution that they wish to pass. In JGA1, the 3 topics were on reforestation, militarization in space, and reducing inequality towards the LGBT+ community. In JGA2, the 3 topics were equal access to education, moving towards sustainable energy sources, and government censorship of social media.
The elder conferences attended to issues of similar content but at a higher caliber. ECOSOC covered improving maternity care in low-income countries, moving towards sustainable energy sources, and addressing problems related to youth bulges in post-conflict countries. HRC covered equal access to education, preventing sexual violence against youth, and eliminating forced marriage. EC covered reforestation, developing a global green economy, and limiting the use of pesticides. SC covered the situation between India and Pakistan in Kashmir, the situation in Venezuela, and the situation in South Sudan.
The chairs of the Junior Assemblies were very welcoming towards their spry and young delegates, giving them guidance and advice in working towards building their resolutions. The young delegates of Junior Assembles were in turn, passionate and ready to begin the start of a long day of debating.
The elder conferences are filled with seasoned delegates: those who have come in prior years and are interested in taking up a bigger challenge in creating amendments towards more specialized issues. Thus, allowing the proceeds of said assemblies to run smoothly and accordingly. In all assemblies across, the murmurs of focused delegates can be heard as they prepare to build a strong argument for their respective resolutions.
All in all, new and experienced delegates alike, there is a sense of passion and drive amongst all of them setting this conference off on the right track.
The elder conferences attended to issues of similar content but at a higher caliber. ECOSOC covered improving maternity care in low-income countries, moving towards sustainable energy sources, and addressing problems related to youth bulges in post-conflict countries. HRC covered equal access to education, preventing sexual violence against youth, and eliminating forced marriage. EC covered reforestation, developing a global green economy, and limiting the use of pesticides. SC covered the situation between India and Pakistan in Kashmir, the situation in Venezuela, and the situation in South Sudan.
The chairs of the Junior Assemblies were very welcoming towards their spry and young delegates, giving them guidance and advice in working towards building their resolutions. The young delegates of Junior Assembles were in turn, passionate and ready to begin the start of a long day of debating.
The elder conferences are filled with seasoned delegates: those who have come in prior years and are interested in taking up a bigger challenge in creating amendments towards more specialized issues. Thus, allowing the proceeds of said assemblies to run smoothly and accordingly. In all assemblies across, the murmurs of focused delegates can be heard as they prepare to build a strong argument for their respective resolutions.
All in all, new and experienced delegates alike, there is a sense of passion and drive amongst all of them setting this conference off on the right track.
Written by Viriyan Mak
Lobbying: GA1, GA2, GA3, GA4, ESCAP
In General Assembly 1, the committee is discussing Disarmament and International Security in regards to Sustainable Development Goal #16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Under this falls the question of regulating the production of nuclear weapons, the question of cyber attacks by foreign countries, and the question of preventing youth fighting in armed conflicts.
General Assembly 2, the Economic and Financial Committee, working under the Sustainable Development Goal #8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, will be discussing the question of the automation of jobs, the question of investing in agricultural technology for sustainable development, and the question of providing fair job opportunities for youth.
General Assembly 3, the Social, Cultural and Humanitarian Committee looking at Sustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced Inequalities, will be debating the question of reducing inequality towards the LGBTQ+ community, the question of representation of youth in government and the question of government censorship of social media.
In General Assembly 4, the Partnerships for the Goals committee will be focusing on Sustainable Goal #17: Special Political and Decolonisation, creating resolutions for the question of militarization of space, the question of the right to privacy from mass surveillance, and the question of reducing violence between Israel and Palestine.
The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific will be making resolutions for the question of democracy and stability in South-East Asia, the question of the implications of China’s Belt and Road policy, and the question of abolishing child trafficking.
The committees have commenced the conference by dividing into groups for lobbying. Throughout the general assemblies and commissions, avid discussion and the synthesis of strong voices and ideas coming together amongst the delegates can be heard. This discourse will preface the delegates on the stances of different nations and provide room for the development of their resolutions. These initial steps towards creating resolutions have set up great potential for fruitful and stimulating debates to come over the course of this conference.
General Assembly 2, the Economic and Financial Committee, working under the Sustainable Development Goal #8: Decent Work and Economic Growth, will be discussing the question of the automation of jobs, the question of investing in agricultural technology for sustainable development, and the question of providing fair job opportunities for youth.
General Assembly 3, the Social, Cultural and Humanitarian Committee looking at Sustainable Development Goal #10: Reduced Inequalities, will be debating the question of reducing inequality towards the LGBTQ+ community, the question of representation of youth in government and the question of government censorship of social media.
In General Assembly 4, the Partnerships for the Goals committee will be focusing on Sustainable Goal #17: Special Political and Decolonisation, creating resolutions for the question of militarization of space, the question of the right to privacy from mass surveillance, and the question of reducing violence between Israel and Palestine.
The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific will be making resolutions for the question of democracy and stability in South-East Asia, the question of the implications of China’s Belt and Road policy, and the question of abolishing child trafficking.
The committees have commenced the conference by dividing into groups for lobbying. Throughout the general assemblies and commissions, avid discussion and the synthesis of strong voices and ideas coming together amongst the delegates can be heard. This discourse will preface the delegates on the stances of different nations and provide room for the development of their resolutions. These initial steps towards creating resolutions have set up great potential for fruitful and stimulating debates to come over the course of this conference.
Written by Alessia Montecalvo
Opening Ceremony
Today marks the opening of the 8th annual ISPPMUN conference, bringing us ever closer to the decade milestone. The hushed conversations of 300 delegates spanning across 20 schools from all over Southeast Asia filled the BlackBox theatre creating a buzz of excitement and exhilaration accompanied by the beautiful melodies of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No. 17. As Ji-won Jung, our resident deputy secretary-general made her way up to the podium, the delegates were quickly silenced and attention was brought to the proceedings of the 2019’s ISPPMUN opening ceremony.
This ceremony bore fruitful speeches from a variety of speakers, consisting of Mr. Gareth Jones, head director of ISPP; Mr. Edwin Van Olst, head and organizer of ISPPMUN; Nadia Fernando, our guest speaker, and fellow ISPP alumni; and Angela Wei, our esteemed secretary-general. With each speaker basing their ideas on this year’s theme: Giving Youth a Voice, our delegates were left with a message of empowerment and strive for action.
Mr. Van Olst left us with a brief, yet impactful speech. Giving his warm welcomes and reminding delegates of the power of the youth as seen in Greta Thunberg, a 16 year old girl, both revered and adored by the world for her dedicated actions towards reversing the impacts of climate change. Greta’s actions have impacted millions in her strive towards raising awareness fueled by the passion of creating the world that the youth want to live in. Mr. Van Olst implores us to discuss problems transcending borders, to try to make amendments rather than shooting them down: to collaborate rather than confront.
Giving youth a voice is an essential idea in building a world of collaboration and sustainability. MUN strives to empower the youth to find power in their voice and to understand the importance of sharing and understanding new perspectives. Fellow youth and secretary-general, Angela Wei, appropriately describes MUN as “a compassionate environment encouraging others to succeed”. With this said, the end of the opening ceremony and the subsequent opening of the conference is met by an uproarious applause marking the start of the empowerment of the youth’s in ISPPMUN’s annual conference.
MUN, as said by Mr. Van Olst, can be considered as a dress rehearsal of the proceedings that take place in legitimately implementing resolutions and fulfilling the desire to amend global issues of delegates. Thus continues ISPPMUN’s ever present goal of opening an event that opens opportunities for the youth to collaborate with each other on pressing global issues. Creating a platform for hundreds of delegates, new and old, to mingle amongst one another and create a boiling pot of ideas and perspectives.
This ceremony bore fruitful speeches from a variety of speakers, consisting of Mr. Gareth Jones, head director of ISPP; Mr. Edwin Van Olst, head and organizer of ISPPMUN; Nadia Fernando, our guest speaker, and fellow ISPP alumni; and Angela Wei, our esteemed secretary-general. With each speaker basing their ideas on this year’s theme: Giving Youth a Voice, our delegates were left with a message of empowerment and strive for action.
Mr. Van Olst left us with a brief, yet impactful speech. Giving his warm welcomes and reminding delegates of the power of the youth as seen in Greta Thunberg, a 16 year old girl, both revered and adored by the world for her dedicated actions towards reversing the impacts of climate change. Greta’s actions have impacted millions in her strive towards raising awareness fueled by the passion of creating the world that the youth want to live in. Mr. Van Olst implores us to discuss problems transcending borders, to try to make amendments rather than shooting them down: to collaborate rather than confront.
Giving youth a voice is an essential idea in building a world of collaboration and sustainability. MUN strives to empower the youth to find power in their voice and to understand the importance of sharing and understanding new perspectives. Fellow youth and secretary-general, Angela Wei, appropriately describes MUN as “a compassionate environment encouraging others to succeed”. With this said, the end of the opening ceremony and the subsequent opening of the conference is met by an uproarious applause marking the start of the empowerment of the youth’s in ISPPMUN’s annual conference.
MUN, as said by Mr. Van Olst, can be considered as a dress rehearsal of the proceedings that take place in legitimately implementing resolutions and fulfilling the desire to amend global issues of delegates. Thus continues ISPPMUN’s ever present goal of opening an event that opens opportunities for the youth to collaborate with each other on pressing global issues. Creating a platform for hundreds of delegates, new and old, to mingle amongst one another and create a boiling pot of ideas and perspectives.
Written by Viriyan Mak